<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mixing Tip – Delay instead of reverb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://audiogeekzine.com/2010/02/mixing-tip-delay-instead-of-reverb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://audiogeekzine.com/2010/02/mixing-tip-delay-instead-of-reverb/</link>
	<description>Pro Audio news, nonsense and occasional debauchery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:36:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://audiogeekzine.com/2010/02/mixing-tip-delay-instead-of-reverb/comment-page-1/#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 03:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=1774#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>My site got nuked a couple months ago and some stuff (like those clips) hasn&#039;t been recovered yet. 

Haas effect can work well sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My site got nuked a couple months ago and some stuff (like those clips) hasn&#8217;t been recovered yet. </p>
<p>Haas effect can work well sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbsr</title>
		<link>http://audiogeekzine.com/2010/02/mixing-tip-delay-instead-of-reverb/comment-page-1/#comment-1324</link>
		<dc:creator>gbsr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=1774#comment-1324</guid>
		<description>sup. first off: the audio files arent working anyhwere, says the files missing. but whats more: you can widen a mix and create &quot;space&quot; aswell using 25ms or less delays, something called the haas effect, or the haas delay. slightly related to this topic. it is a psychoacoustic phenomenon that works something like this: anything that is percieved as around 30ish ms (give or take 5) or less will be percieved as a single source, so if you pan the nondelayed source and delayed source a bit (45 degrees around) you can create an incredibly wide mix without compromising too much spectral space. just be careful of phase issues :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sup. first off: the audio files arent working anyhwere, says the files missing. but whats more: you can widen a mix and create &#8220;space&#8221; aswell using 25ms or less delays, something called the haas effect, or the haas delay. slightly related to this topic. it is a psychoacoustic phenomenon that works something like this: anything that is percieved as around 30ish ms (give or take 5) or less will be percieved as a single source, so if you pan the nondelayed source and delayed source a bit (45 degrees around) you can create an incredibly wide mix without compromising too much spectral space. just be careful of phase issues <img src='http://audiogeekzine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Home Recording Show &#8211; Ryan Canestro, Jon Tidey, and Jesse Zoller &#187; Show 63 &#8211; delay instead of reverb &#38; computer basics</title>
		<link>http://audiogeekzine.com/2010/02/mixing-tip-delay-instead-of-reverb/comment-page-1/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>The Home Recording Show &#8211; Ryan Canestro, Jon Tidey, and Jesse Zoller &#187; Show 63 &#8211; delay instead of reverb &#38; computer basics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=1774#comment-757</guid>
		<description>[...] Geek Zine: Mixing Tip &#8211; Using delay instead of reverb    Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Geek Zine: Mixing Tip &#8211; Using delay instead of reverb    Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave (chckn8r)</title>
		<link>http://audiogeekzine.com/2010/02/mixing-tip-delay-instead-of-reverb/comment-page-1/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave (chckn8r)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=1774#comment-756</guid>
		<description>Nice segment Jon - I like to do this too.

I had the same question as Joe - I usually use a stereo delay that has LR cross-feed in it (the one that comes in Logic (gasp) actually does the job nicely).  You can really get fancy with some multi-tap delays cross-feeding each other to get some more full sounds too.

I know you cranked the FX to illustrate, but yeah, I just put a touch of this on bringing it up to just noticeable and then backing off, then also send the dry signal to a room verb with just the ER enabled - gets that subtle, reverb feel without the annoying tails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice segment Jon &#8211; I like to do this too.</p>
<p>I had the same question as Joe &#8211; I usually use a stereo delay that has LR cross-feed in it (the one that comes in Logic (gasp) actually does the job nicely).  You can really get fancy with some multi-tap delays cross-feeding each other to get some more full sounds too.</p>
<p>I know you cranked the FX to illustrate, but yeah, I just put a touch of this on bringing it up to just noticeable and then backing off, then also send the dry signal to a room verb with just the ER enabled &#8211; gets that subtle, reverb feel without the annoying tails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://audiogeekzine.com/2010/02/mixing-tip-delay-instead-of-reverb/comment-page-1/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 05:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=1774#comment-755</guid>
		<description>@banjar
Nope, doesn&#039;t work like that. What you&#039;re suggesting will not have the same effect. You need the feedback loop to create the effect.

Also its Center, Left &amp; Right signals. Left and right bleed into each other.

Follow the signal flow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@banjar<br />
Nope, doesn&#8217;t work like that. What you&#8217;re suggesting will not have the same effect. You need the feedback loop to create the effect.</p>
<p>Also its Center, Left &#038; Right signals. Left and right bleed into each other.</p>
<p>Follow the signal flow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: banjar teratai capung</title>
		<link>http://audiogeekzine.com/2010/02/mixing-tip-delay-instead-of-reverb/comment-page-1/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>banjar teratai capung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 05:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=1774#comment-754</guid>
		<description>to made more easier - just duplicate track and move few millisecond and add with plug in anything you want so simple</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to made more easier &#8211; just duplicate track and move few millisecond and add with plug in anything you want so simple</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://audiogeekzine.com/2010/02/mixing-tip-delay-instead-of-reverb/comment-page-1/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=1774#comment-753</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Joe.
It&#039;s basically the same routing as a ping-pong delay but using much smaller delay times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Joe.<br />
It&#8217;s basically the same routing as a ping-pong delay but using much smaller delay times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Gilder</title>
		<link>http://audiogeekzine.com/2010/02/mixing-tip-delay-instead-of-reverb/comment-page-1/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Gilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=1774#comment-752</guid>
		<description>Okay, I think I just answered my own question. You&#039;re feeding each aux into the other. Gotcha.

Sorry, for some reason the left side of your screen shot won&#039;t really come up on my screen.

Cool stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I think I just answered my own question. You&#8217;re feeding each aux into the other. Gotcha.</p>
<p>Sorry, for some reason the left side of your screen shot won&#8217;t really come up on my screen.</p>
<p>Cool stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Gilder</title>
		<link>http://audiogeekzine.com/2010/02/mixing-tip-delay-instead-of-reverb/comment-page-1/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Gilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=1774#comment-751</guid>
		<description>Very cool, Jon. Delay can be SO much more effective than reverb on certain tunes.

Quick question: Why not just use a single stereo delay on a stereo bus? Your screenshot shows two of the basic Digi delays. If you just used the stereo Digi delay, you could do the exact same thing. It lets you adjust the left and right delays independently of one another.

Just curious what benefits you get from two mono aux vs one stereo aux?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool, Jon. Delay can be SO much more effective than reverb on certain tunes.</p>
<p>Quick question: Why not just use a single stereo delay on a stereo bus? Your screenshot shows two of the basic Digi delays. If you just used the stereo Digi delay, you could do the exact same thing. It lets you adjust the left and right delays independently of one another.</p>
<p>Just curious what benefits you get from two mono aux vs one stereo aux?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Woodward</title>
		<link>http://audiogeekzine.com/2010/02/mixing-tip-delay-instead-of-reverb/comment-page-1/#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Woodward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=1774#comment-750</guid>
		<description>D&#039;oh! Sorry, totally missed that. You definitely nailed it, then. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D&#8217;oh! Sorry, totally missed that. You definitely nailed it, then. <img src='http://audiogeekzine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: audiogeekzine.com @ 2012-02-08 14:07:59 -->
